tags:
It seems you have no tags attached to pages. To attach a tag simply click on the tags button at the bottom of any page.
4 pages:
| Category name | Threads | Posts | Last post |
This category groups discussions of comments related to particular pages within this site. | 86 | 0 |
RSS: New threads | New posts
Add to this wiki
Edit | Code | Tag | Commentsn/show Forum {$permit_forum} can create
Contact {$permit_chat} can create | Wiki {$permit_wiki} can create | Blog Any wikidot.com user can create | Doc Any member can create
| July 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Next | General Anyone can create | How |
Contributors: 1
Contributors: 1
Contributors: 9
Contributors: 1
Contributors: 7
Contributors: 1
Contributors: 7
Contributors: 2
Contributors: 6
Latest pages in this site:
Translations for the 6 points defining common company created: 01 Dec 2012 03:07
tags:
Comments: 0, Rating: 0
Ask namZeZaM
Common Company (ComCom) in 6 points . You can now join the new comcomized.com platform. Why?
Either I am represented in my democratic state and hence what it does is in my responsibility, or I become peer owner in the texture of entities constituting my state.
- The problem: The bigger the group of equal individuals is the weaker is the power of each individual.
- The solution: Each individual owns equal part of the group's assets and evaluates it as a whole when leaving the group. Hence, when such small groups equally own bigger ones, the movement of the individual does not harm the bigger, making the solution scalable.
- more..
- See also http://yes-i-am-angry.wikidot.com
- A "leadership crisis"? A "failed system"? Here is an alternative - A stock market regulation aligned with the following six points to benefit customers, which are "peer owners" over parts of the sellers, which are companies in that market.
Q) What type of legal entity has the comcom to be formed in ?
A) The formation can be in any area between public (stock) company to all types of associations, such as non profit, profit or for-profit associations and includes private ownership or networking of a partnership, when all are based on agreements (personal and / or common) and/or laws and including without any contradiction the six points defining comcom and with these equivalents:
- The business' profit is equivalent to the welfare of the association's members
- The business' owners holdings is equivalent to the maintenance (of services, means and holdings) by members and/or their representatives in the associations,
- The value of holding in business is exchangeable for money and in association to object-coin or peer-coin (which can be bitcoin like).
Q) What exact type of association?
A) e.g: trade association combined with credit union.
Q) From where to start?
A) From the respective of the comcom agreement the process can start from any possible/wished type of body with agreement to bind the bodies together, if not in a partnership of ownership with illegal because of some specific legal mismatch, then at least in (temporary) maintenance authorities over the means (production, service and maintenance) of the body.
Comcomized unit versus cooperative (and in larger scale, states and democracy of the masses)
In short - comcomized unit versus cooperative gives more power to each member and minorities, making comcomizing the units (including comcomizing cooperatives) more important for each member, as larger and heterogenic is the unit. Here are 3 points about it making it better "sound" for the 99%: As a share holder;
- you independently sets the value of your share in your exiting and hence instantly, but with restrained, effecting the price of your executive power and all other members.
- both, your common interest (since the share holding is eqaul) and individual (since it is a share holding) interest, are generated from the same possition of the peer owners;
- You are in winwin position of both: entrance and exit.
Conclusion: This is optionally good for making independent and growing bottom up economic, by having small comcomized units, each being both: peer owner of a bigger comcomized unit and a department in it, as peer-coins evaluate the holding in the small units and as the object-coins evaluate the services or product moving between the departments.
When Co-Ownership is the better choice?
- in becoming stronger customers of organization (while using your boycotting power),
- in becoming stronger members in any large and auth entic organization, or
- politically, in making the bailouts working for the people, by becoming peer owners (equal shareholder) over the assets of the organization.//
This agreement is designed for protecting against been taking over, for allowing competition between groups, benefiting thier individuals, able to migrate between the groups, while becoming stronger versus the groups or versus their executives, because of the common and individual interest given in the peers' postion , which is a winwin postion, in both cases: entry and exit, while always having the power of reflection of satisfaction of the owners, being the masses of the customers being the peer owners (how? search: yes i am angry).
This is for empowering individuals and for providing social strength and practically it can be used for solving both
the cycling of privatization nationalization, such that the government's position would be taking equally by the people claimed to be protected by such government (how? search: govcomcom); and
the credit supernova (- the point of arrival of the dept monetary systems), such that larger such "common companies" allow trading in (and versus) both: "object coins" and "peer coins" of the peer owners in the smaller companies becoming departments in the bigger ones.
The peer coin and object coin as means for trading and evaluating ownership and goods, sometime even without money and hence as non taxable means.
Non taxable ,Why? As long as migration is legal, paying tax is only a choice backing the actions of the taxing authority and its ascendancy! For instance For instance, making the german tax payer to back exporting weapon (and in large scale as being the 3rd largest), exploitation of over sea lands, people and/or corrupt governments and to back the strategy of "too big to fall" discriminating cyprus in the case of luxembourg.
The peer-coin or the object-coin is an accumulative and exchangeable medium, suspending its exchange while holding the trust that it is exchangeable for tangible things in a space governed by agreements between those exchanging the coins and having the trust in the exchange. Sometimes, when the coin is exchangeable only for moderated property, such coin has on itself both symbols, one representing its value and other representing the value's expiration date. Both, the peers-coin and the objects-coin are to be used, when a holding comcom is, or represents, a department in the held comcom, being the governing space of the exchange, as the "departments" are trading across the held comcom (see this picture):
- A) the peers-coin is used for evaluating ownership in the exit/entry of holders of comcom/department and
- B) the objects-coin is used as a fiat money of the held comcom for evaluating (temporal) responsibility/ownership over objects, such as products, services and/or holdings, in the transfer of the objects between holding departments/comcoms.
How to calculate the ratio between object-coin and peer-coin, x-peers-coin and y-objects-coin, x-peers-coin and y-peers-coin or x-objects-coin and y-objects-coin?
- peer-coin evaluates in a one comcom the ownership of one peer owner, where one peer-coin=v=(t/c)*d and t is the total holding value of all the comcom, c is the number of the peers and d is the ratio of the portion held by all the peers.
- object-coin evaluates periodical use of object being products, services and/or holdings, for being use by a caretaker (and not a renter) supplying service of/on/by the object being held directly or indirectly by one "held comcom", where the object is attributed to the caretaker being peer owner of the "held comcom" and a department in the "held comcom".
- practically the peers-coin and objects-coin could be implemented like bitcoin but without mining or with last descendant comcom holding the bitcoin pooled mining and with uid.
When debt money system is a perfect expropriation device, have a tax free option of 2 coin types: 1 of peers & 1 of objects and use them between small & equal common companies holding one bigger, while being its departments.
How to guarantee no multiplication of identities of holder in and across common companies?
In real life, all owners of multiple layers structure of comcoms must be attending together. This can be verified by all being marked on a specific non private part of their body (nose), as they are numbered/nicked-named-uniquely by the mark and as they are marked together in one time lasting less than the time for the marks to disappear - this marking may be done even in different locations. Such marking can also be done by a kind of unique per user device.
Do you agree that clever, honest and authentic politicians should have push for
- GovComCom,
- ComComized stock market and
- tax reduction for any comcom at the rate of 100% times d times "the number of peers" divided by "the number of customers"?
If so, please let them know it ! :)
Tradability is important, Why?
ComComized unit guarantees equality between its peer members being its owners, sitting at its top and owning equal share of it, but why should any such member be able also to trade her/his membership?
- This makes the member becoming more powerfull, while being in a winwin situation - stay in only when is satisfied or go out with a return value. Example: When one sells her/his $10 share only in $9, the executive power of the unit is automatically reduced in 10%, as anyone (out of unit) can see it and hence that power (in the top of the unit) now must care more for the satisfaction of the memebers.
- The satisfaction/desatisfaction of the members is now automatically and directly transparent, as the memebrs are free when are reflecting their evaluation about the acts of the representatives of their organization.
- Compared with cooperatives: comcomized unit is good for its members in huge and heterogeneous society, such society as of being customers, as cooperative is good for the members in small and homogeneous communities, since the cooperative is build upon trust between the members and the power of member in cooperative is reduced with any increase of the number of the members, if only because each human is always limited in the number of other people the one can evaluate for being trusty.
- Also, in registered cooperatives, governments has unnecessary power over their creation, whereas in registered comcom, as being a normal company, the value of the damage done by breaking the contract is recognizable and
- all cases of "transferring ownership", such as in the case of "the change for america", are impossible.
- Also and because the mobility in the exit, when 2 comcomized units are clashed ans since the members can move to the better one, such clashes tends to end faster and more peacefully.
- Also, in registered cooperatives, governments has unnecessary power over their creation, whereas in registered comcom, as being a normal company, the value of the damage done by breaking the contract is recognizable and
Very Generally speaking
- Compared with the co-op structuring being more hermetic, the ComComism allows a check and balance by the existing and optional peers over the executive power of their unit, by constantly being able to influence or check the performances over a constant given time of such executives, as such performances are reflected in the lowest, the average and the highest share price and may be estimated through both numbers: of the transactions and of the (peer and/or ordinary) owners in any specific unit, (where the ratio of transactions to owners could help in estimating the reliability of such reflection); and
- the normal recommended flow of ownership
- goes from the many individuals making, as peers and among themselves, a personal agreement of ownership over "something", which is optionally expandable for including other things, or strating in owning a club, through many clubs owning limited company, to the many limited companies owning public companies and
- splits as the ordinary owners are the providers for the peers, such providers as
- contributes,
- employees,
- contractor or
- comcom/companies.
| Personal agreement e.g. by a click for ownership over a site by its members. | Club If d=1, then the legal form of the comcom can easily be established as a club (social, political, buying club or users' group etc), but only as any member can sell her/his own (fees for) membership at any price while caring (via representatives) for updating the "reflective value of the club" to match the price made in that transaction. Such price and/or such "reflective value of the club" can be in a nominal value stated in points as the club believe each point to correlate with currency e.g. as 1 point correlates to $2.345. | Limited company | Public company | |
| Scale | smallest | smaller and simpler | bigger and more difficult | biggest |
| Enforcement such of tax and attached value to claims | least | less | more | most |
Some links:
| @A@The Personal Agreement Of Ownership Establishing Comcom . | @W@4 levels low cost Workshops And Trainings for Comcomism | @M@Comcomized Mailing Services- the basic Internet platform for comcomism, renting services for mailing list of which members are its owners, implementing real time and active ownership. |
| @DOInvest As A Peer-owner Instead Of Donate | @IS The 55-structuring | @OM ComCom-Community |
| @GO Govcomcom demand your government to list those who are to be reword by its privatization or its bailout and then take those in the list to become peer owners in a comcom of which your government took share or should have been taking shares. | @SB Comcomism For Small Businesses | @CS Comcom Social - Social Networking with more of ownership of ts members - less of donation and in a constant start-up's mood |
| Secure data storage by the SDP | ||
| interview (5) on youtube | cycle-it | |
|---|---|---|
| @O@ Comcomism - the organizations (comcomism Org) for establishing Scomcom of (d=1, 20<=c<=100) becoming holders in ComComIsm LTD ! | @I@Invest in one of the N Comcom Organizations which are P-Holders In the Comcomism Ltd | @C@the Comcomism Ltd |
| peer-owners The Book | ||
| Do something | Earn from it! | |
| Low Cost Workshops | ||
- peer-owners-your-net
- The World Is Now Changing
- Europa-flyer.pdf
- 99occupy: Decentralized, global and "comcomized" (equally owned by its users) platforms for the 99%
- comcomize by/for the occupy movements
- manual
- calendar for the comcomism connect
- fight bailout
- The full guidance for the agreements used for comcomized units
- do something, If you like it.
…also, read this image some images here and here
What forming the contract should include?
The contract (an example) shall define the following:
- the company, such as the company is defined by the will of its owners in the legal frame of the current country. (i.e. this agreement is under laws of what country/ies?);
- its goals, such as providing improvement of conditions of it owners. As for the issue of taxation, the project is part of bigger one aiming to create a new market, where the exact conditions for and of that market, as the project is to be developed organically, are to be decided by the new shareholders still to be recruited;
- its structuring (above 6 points); and
- the rights and duties of its owners: Paragraphs 14-17 from here;
- acceptable equivalences to money in exchange for ownership, such as in notes (of measurements for qualities of things), in hours or effort of spending or in goods such as of content etc;
- additional limitation of liability ; and
- start value - does it have a starting money/assets?
See some more images here
By iswith, on 27 Oct 2012 21:07 history Tags:
~~Page's End!~~ Ignore ads by installing ublock.